Gardner, Bloom and Dale
Each of these theories supports and detracts from technology integration for learning in an early elementary classroom. Gardner's theory supports technology integration in the classroom, because this integration may offer many programs that directly relate to the individual intelligences. However, if certain programs do not support the different intelligences or are not set up in a proficent way, this theory would detract from technology integration. Bloom's taxonomy also supports technology integration in an early elementary classroom. If children learn at a young age to work with computers and other technological devices the will keep developing their skills. Dale's cone of experience also supports technology integration, because techology can provide very engaging and hands-on experiences. According to this theory, these types of programs are the most effective for student learning. This theory could also detract, because teachers could learn to rely too much on computers. In an early elementary classroom there are many things that the students should learn by experieces that computers cannot offer.
Each one of these theories relates to type 1, 11, or 111 uses of technology. Gardners theory realtes best to type 11, because the types of applications on computers allows students to work with out the aid of their teachers. For example, a liguistic learner may be able to use a word processing application to study with out any direction from the teacher. Bloom's taxonomy relates to type 1, because it is the teachers responsibility to implement the correct programs for success. Dale's cone of experience relates to type 111, because while technology can add to and enhance a teacher's lesson, the teacher must be there to guide and provide real life experiences.
No comments:
Post a Comment